Narrative versus accuracy

There’s a certain feature of political reporting that is annoying me more and more of late, it’s the apparent desire of journalists to engage in good story telling rather than striving for accuracy. While polemicists from both ends of the political spectrum have used the cover of ‘opinion writing’ to publish profoundly partisan reinterpretations of events forever, news reporters seem to be falling onto the trap of massaging their stories to spice them up too.

The example today that really irked me was the ABC’s declaration that the government and opposition had negotiated to allow the renewable energy bill pass the lower house. Any school child with a basic grounding in how our parliamentary system works can tell you that the government is whichever party holds the most seats, therefore votes, in the lower house. It’s irrelevant which way the opposition votes in the lower house, the government always carries whatever motion they put up.

While discussion of cross party negotiations over a bill may be important when it comes to the senate, trying to somehow suggest that the government is beholden to the opposition to pass legislation through the lower house is incorrect and adds a strange tone to the discussion. This isn’t a question of balance, or bias, it’s simply about accuracy. Journalists and commentators in the media decry governments’ attempts to ‘spin’ news to suit them better, but how can they expect to be dealt with in an open fashion when they can’t get the basics right and are perpetually looking for a ‘gotcha’ moment in every situation.

This isn’t just a problem with political reporting, the release of the interim report from the Victorian Bushfire Royal Commission has seen plenty of uninformed speculation on ABC Victoria and Radio National, sometimes promoting ideas that have explicitly been dismissed by the very report they are claiming to be discussing. In this case, the ABC seem to be gunning for the scalp of CFA Chief Officer Russell Rees and are building a narrative around his failures. Some ABC presenters have also criticised the interim report for not addressing particular areas which were never going to be included until the final report, giving the impression that the Royal Commission has been negligent.

The questions of balance and bias are always going to be contentious ones to address, but the news media should make a consistent effort to banish simple inaccuracies from their reporting. If news is the first draft of history, it should least try to get the basics right.

6 thoughts on “Narrative versus accuracy

  1. Dave, is this the part you’re referring to:

    It only took one day of negotiations to get the legislation through the House of Representatives and it is expected to pass through the Senate before the end of the week.

    What’s incorrect about that? The reason that the Government would negotiate with the opposition before they passed it through the lower house, was to ensure it passed through the senate. The repoert is accurate.

  2. To be honest Ray, what really sparked me off was the way that they reported it on ABC radio. It left the impression that the negotiation was the sole reason that the legislation passed through the House of Reps, which is clearly untrue, but adds to the drama of the report.

    Negotiation or no, the bill would always of passed Reps, just like the ETS did.

  3. Btw, I wish that bloody gravatar of me in the pool would go away – I’ve deleted it and put a new one up but the friggin’ thing is still there!

  4. I know – what was I thinking?

    Actually Dave, what happened was someone made a comment at my site (Orville, I think) that my previous gravatar that I had up for a few days was “freaking (him) out”. So I had a look at it and, yes, it wasn’t as good as the original. Not being a narscissist (Er, what?) I don’t have a lot of photos of myself so for some reason I replaced it with the one of me in the pool.

    And am I regretting it or what?

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s